Algorithm of Solving of Problem Situation (ASPS)
- The constant use of ARIZ-85B over the 5 years in order to solve technical problems by the very author of this work, as well as the listeners of the seminars allows to shorten the intermediate steps of part 1 of the algorithm, to detail the concept and the wording of the operating time in part 2 and on its basis to refine the steps of part 3. Also, the author things that the analysis of the resources should only be done after the Ideal Final Result is formulated and there's an opportunity of doing such analysis purposefully. The main structure of ASPS was set towards the year 1990, over the course of following years it was checked by solving of tens of problems and showed it's high adaptability to manufacture. During this time certain wording in the steps of the algorithm were refined for clarity.
Mark Meerovich Laboratory " Ukraine TRIZ-education"
(Short version of ARPS - without detail
comments)
ATTENTION! Algorithm
is a tool FOR ORGANIZATION of thinking - NOT a REPLACEMENT of it! Don't
hurry. Carefully think over every STEP and write them down. STEP 1
1.1 Technical
system for
...............(specify the Primary Function - PF) by means of ...............(specify the Principle of Operation - PO) consists of ................(enumerate the all
parts of the system) In
the process of realization of the PF: .........(specify the PF), a
Harmful Effect 1 (HE1): .........(specify HE1) occurs. In
order to eliminate HE1:
.........(specify HE1), Means
Of Removing (MOR): .........(specify possible MOR) can be used. But
when using these MORs, new Harmful Effects 2 (HE2) occur. ...............(Specify
HE2 for every MOR). 1.2
Write
the scheme of the problem without
professional terms:
1.3 Examine
variants of the Technical Contradictions (TC) in
their extreme states and write them down. ____ TC1: MOR ð HE1** ð HE2 IF MOR: .........(Specify MOR)
enter THEN HE1: .........(Specify
HE1) removed BUT new HE2:
.........(Specify
HE2) appears ____ ____ TC2: MOR ð HE2 ð HE1 IF MOR: .........(Specify MOR)
don't enter THEN HE2: .........(Specify
HE2) doesn't appear BUT HE1: .........( Specify
HE1) remained Step 2.
Formulation of the invention problem
_____ ____ ____ MOR
ð
HE2 + HE1 It
is necessary to find such an X-element, which while
preserving the capability of ABSENTEE MOR: .........(specify
MOR) to
not create HE2: .........(specify HE2), would
also remove .........(specify
HE1). Step 3.
Determine the Operation Zone (ZOP) -
- the space, where the conflict takes place The
composition of the ZOP must consist of: -
An object, which will be subjected to a harmful influence (HE1),
and - An object, which exerts the
harmful influence. Step 4.
Determine Operation Time (TOP).
Operation
Time - TOP, which consists of: - The time of conflict Ò1 - The time prior to the conflict Ò2 - The time of fulfillment of the Primary Function Ò3 In a
general case: Ò =
T1 + T2 + T3 Three
variants are possible, depending on the relationship between the time
when the conflict takes place, and the time when the Primary Function performs. 4.1 Variant
"Either Ò1 or Ò3 ": Production
process (Ò2 =
Ò3),
which has already begun, is interrupted by the conflict. The
system "waits" for the conflict to end (Ò1)
in order to resume the production process. In this case: Ò = T1 + T3(T2) 4.2 Variant
"Both Ò1
and Ò3" The conflict takes place simultaneously with the
beginning of the production process, being its integral part. Here: Ò = T1(T3)+ T2 4.3
Variant "Ò1
part of Ò3" The conflict takes place only with definite
parameters of the PF. As a rule, the system's goal is to reduce Ò1 to
zero, and to prevent its occurrence. It this case: Ò = T3 = T1 + T2 Step 5.
The Physical Contradiction on the macro-level - Macro-PhC
In ZOP
.........(Specify ZOP) during ...(specify the time of a
fulfillment of the PF Ò3) should be .........(specify
the physical macro-state, e.g., "be long", "be hot") in order to perform the Primary Function PF, and should be .........(specify
the opposite physical macro-state, e.g., "be short", "be
cold") in order
to prevent the Harmful Effect HE1 at the time of the conflict .........(specify
the conflict time Ò1). Step 6.
The Physical Contradiction on the micro-level - micro-PhC
Between
.........(specify contact surfaces) there must be particles of a
substance, which would: - ensure .........(specify
physical state of the best for a fulfillment of PF) and - ensure .........(specify
opposite physical state, in which ÂE1 doesn't appear). Step 7.
Ideal Final Result - IFR
Technical system should ITSELF provide a presence of particles
between .........(specify
contacting surfaces), which would ensure .........(specify
opposite physical states). Step 8.
Formulate the demands on the characteristics of the particles
which would ensure the conditions under which the HE1 would occur:
The particles must be.........
Step 9.
Analyze the composition of the system and figure out whether or
not the system has the elements that are the required characteristics.
Step 10.
If the problem is solved move on to the part 7
of ARIZ-85B, If the problem isn't solved, continue the
analysis under part 4 of ARIZ-85B. ______________________________________________________________________________
* Steps
1 - 2 ASPS were developed on the basis of work of V. Korolev "The
First Part"- http://triz.port5.com/data/w68.html Steps 3 - 7 were
developed on the basis of steps 2nd and 3rd parts of ARIZ-85B by G.
Altshuller - comment of author (M. Meyerovich). ___ **Line
above the abbreviation, e.g. HE1, marks it's opposite state or its
absence (not-HE1) - comment of author (M. Meyerovich). © - M. Meyerovich Translated by Ivan Prokoshyn (Canada) About author:
Mark Meerovich born in 1941 TRIZ Expert (20 years experience). Master of TRIZ (qualified by Genrich
Altshuller). Master of Science in Engineering. Professor (logistics, project management)
at the ChOUEHS, Odessa, Ukraine and leader of the Scientific-practical
Laboratory "Ukraine TRIZ-education" (ChOUEHS, Odessa, Ukraine).
TRIZ experience: 20 years experience in
problem solving management (research problem, manufactures problems,
management problems etc.). Large experience in TRIZ education (more than
80 seminars). Former students: engineers, researchers, managers,
children, and schoolteachers. Area of scientific interests: Technology of forming
creative thinking and "Cutting-edge pedagogic" that develops
characteristic of a creative individual in students. More than 20 publications and 3 books (on
technology of developing of creative thinking). E-mail: mark_lara@mail.ru |